Visit The U.S. Veteran Dispatch PX for Veteran and POW/MIA Related
T-shirts, Hats, Pins and much more.
PREVENT WORLD WAR III
BOYCOTT RED CHINA
Wakeup America and face the facts: We fought and
defeated the Nazis and the Japanese in the epic war of all time. Then we fought
the Soviets in the Cold War. And we prevailed in those battles for over 40
years of difficult times at home and around the world. But we won.
Now the big enemy of the United States is Red China. The sooner we admit it and
prepare for it the better. All the fancy talk about how much we "want to
work together" by engaging communist China in trade is suicidal. The Red
Chinese aim to destroy us.
We Must
STOP Financing Our Own
Destruction
It is Time to Use Our
Economic Voting Power to Short Circuit the Political Power of Washington's
Pro-Trade with China Politicians
It is Simple, Don't Buy Anything Made in Red
China!
Aside from the Red China's military threat against the
United States, take into account Red China's brutal Human rights abuses,
religious persecution, forced abortions, selling of body organs of prisoners,
and the assault on Taiwan and Tibet etc. etc.
China is planning war against the
United States.
Read what its leaders are saying.
"Seen from the changes in the world situation and the United States'
hegemonic strategy for creating monopolarity, war
is inevitable...We cannot avoid it. The issue is that the
Chinese armed forces must control the initiative in this war....We must be
prepared to fight for one year, two years, three years or even longer."
Chi Haotian, Chinese Defense Minister, Cheng Ming, Hong Kong's newspaper,
January 11, 2000
And what they have been taught;
Mao Tse-tung
founded the People's Republic of China in 1949. He was one of the
founders of the Chinese Communist regarded, along with Karl Marx and V. I.
Lenin, as one of the three great theorists of Marxian communism.
Quotations from Mao Tse-tung, founder of Red
China;
" Every Communist must grasp the truth,
‘Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.'"
". . . When politics develops to a certain stage beyond which it cannot
proceed by the usual means, war breaks out to sweep the obstacles from the
way.... When the obstacle is removed and our political aim attained the war
will stop. But if the obstacle is not completely swept away, the war will have
to continue till the aim is fully accomplished.... It can therefore be said
that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed.
". . . The seizure of power by armed force, the settlement of the issue by
war, is the central task and the highest form of revolution. This
Marxist-Leninist principle of revolution holds good universally, for China and
for all other countries."
"I have said that all the reputedly powerful reactionaries are merely
paper tigers. The reason is that they are divorced from the people. Look! Was
not Hitler a paper tiger? Was Hitler not overthrown? I also said that the tsar
of Russia, the emperor of China and Japanese imperialism were all paper tigers.
As we know, they were all overthrown. U.S. imperialism has not yet been
overthrown and it has the atom bomb. I believe it also will be overthrown. It,
too, is a paper tiger."
China's War Plan
The People's Republic of China is actively planning a military invasion of
Taiwan and is preparing to wage war against the United States " including
firing its small arsenal of strategic nuclear missiles on the territory of the
United States " if Washington attempts to defend the island. In an
internal document from the Chinese Communist Party's Central Military
Commission to all its regional commanders, Beijing says it hopes to absorb
Taiwan through nonviolent means but warns of an "increased possibility for
a military solution, arguing: "It is better to fight now than [in the]
future " the earlier, the better.
In the document,
"China
Prepares for War", Beijing envisions a blitzkrieg-like attack on
Taiwan, launching a "first fatal strike so that" the Taiwan forces
have no way to organize effective resistance. Under this plan, "we will be
able to control Taiwan before the U.S. intervention and then concentrate our
forces to fight the U.S.
Beijing anticipates that the United States will not be able to maintain its
forces in combat against China for an extended period. The document reasons
that the conflict will not escalate into a nuclear missile exchange, because
the U.S. will lose its will to fight and withdraw after suffering serious
casualties, while the Chinese side will be able to absorb heavy casualties and
prevail.
"Our principle is willing to sustain major losses of our armed forces
to defend even just one square inch of land" the document says. "If
the U.S. forces lose thousands or hundreds of men under our powerful strikes,
the anti-war sentiment within their country will force the U.S. government to
take the same path as they did in Vietnam.
The one element that China needs to start and finish a war is money.
Even
the threat of a trade halt with China will take away from its war resources. Hit them hard where they cannot respond and where it hurts the
most, in their wallet.
Don't buy if it is made in Red China..
CHINA GAINS ENTRY TO U.S. FINANCIAL MARKETS
According to John Berlau (Investor's Business Daily, 1/4/00, p. 1), "Of
all the global business mergers and alliances, none is likely to have more
impact -- or create more controversy -- than the new alliance between the
Nasdaq stock market and the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong. "The Nasdaq and
Hong Kong's exchange plan to have dual listings on each other's markets. Seven
American companies, including Microsoft Corp., Cisco Systems Inc. and Dell
Computer Corp., are expected to list in Hong Kong in February. ..."
How the Hard-Driving G.O.P.
Gave Clinton a Trade Victory
(Tom DeLay, Colin Powell, Gov. George Bush)
By ERIC SCHMITT
The New York Times
B>May 26, 2000
". . . When Representative Tom DeLay came to work on Wednesday, he was
still a vote or two shy of the bare-minimum 150 Republicans he needed to help
push the China trade bill over the top. Mr. DeLay, the Republican whip, had
lined up lots of help.
Gov. George W. Bush of Texas was recruited to cajole several wavering
Republicans. So was Gen. Colin L. Powell. Dozens of pro-grade lobbyists and
corporate chieftains fanned out on Capitol Hill to buttonhole the last dozen or
so undeclared members for what both camps predicted would be a nail-biter.
"Over the next crucial hours, those calls and an array of other influences
paid off, as virtually every undeclared Republican, and even a few others who
had been written off, broke Mr. DeLay's way. In all, 164 Republicans joined 73
Democrats [who] voted to grant China permanent normal trading status, wiping
out economic restrictions rooted in cold-war policy for a quarter century.
..."
Big Bucks-Big Names For Trade With Red China
From The Washington Times
By George Archibald
1997-Mar-3,
". . . Old hands hold hands with Beijing on trade policy
Big bucks and big names are proving to be corporate America's
weapons of choice in a heightened lobbying push to head off any U.S.
retaliation for China's reported involvement in the unfolding political
fund-raising scandal.
Henry A. Kissinger, secretary of state in the Nixon and Ford administrations
and longtime adviser to major American businesses in China, is a key adviser to
corporate leaders of a lobbying campaign announced last week by more than 1,000 top
companies seeking expanded U.S.-China trade relations.
Alexander M. Haig Jr., former secretary of state under President Reagan, also
is advising both American companies and the Chinese government's maritime
shipping company in the campaign.
The Cox Report
On May 25, 1999, the House Select Committee on U.S. National Security and
Military/Commercial Concerns With the People's Republic of China issued
the declassified version of its report (the Cox Report) on China's acquisition of
U.S. technology in a number of sensitive areas, including nuclear weapons,
high-performance computers, and missile and space systems.
The committee's full report, which was classified Top Secret when it was issued
on January 3, 1999 (and which remains classified) was unanimously approved by the
panel's five Republicans and four Democrats.
The elaborately presented three-volume declassified
COX REPORT,
which comprises nearly 900 pages, contains extensive background information,
a detailed review of China's acquisition efforts, the principal cases of alleged
technology transfer, the committee's assessment of the impact of these transfers,
and 38 recommendations for the president and the Congress on how to deal with the
situation.
From the Mindszenty Report
http://www.mindszenty.org/report/1997/aug97/aug97.html
August 1997
The China lobby is among the most sophisticated in Washington. Those who help advance
China's interest include former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger, George Schultz, Alexander
Haig, Lawrence Eagleburger and Cyrus Vance -- each of whom has earned tens of thousands of
dollars from U.S. businesses doing business in China.
For the record, The Knight-Ridder newspaper chain's Washington bureau -- with information
provided by the Federal Elections Commission -- provides the following which it calls: "The
China Lobby in the U.S.":
"Firms belonging to the U.S.-China Business Council contributed more than $55 million to
political campaigns in 1995 and 1996, making them an important lobby for favorable U.S.
policies toward China."
Top five overall contributors were: Phillip Morris, AT&T, Federal Express, BellSouth and
Atlantic Richfield. And breaking it down to specific business categories: Communications --
GTE, AT&T, Ameritech, BellSouth, SBC Comm., Inc.; Aerospace -- Lockheed Martin, Textron,
Inc., Northrop Grum., United Tech., Boeing Co.; Food/beverage -- Jos. E. Seagram, Coca-Cola
Co., PepsiCo, Inc., McDonald's, Anheuser-Busch; Energy -- Atlantic Richfield, Chevron,
Tenneco, Inc., Exxon Corp., Amoco Corp.; Pharmaceuticals -- Eli Lilly & Co., Pfizer, Inc.,
Bristol-Myers Sq., Abbott Labs., Amgen, Inc.; Banking/financial services -- Arthur Andersen,
Morgan Stanley, Price Waterhouse, Coopers Lybrand, American Express; Consumer Goods --
Windmere Corp., Limited, Inc., Amway Corp., Procter & Gamble, General Electric.
In addition to the big money, U.S.-China Business Council, a whole web of interconnected and
funded coalitions also played a role in lobbying Congress on behalf of Beijing. Such as: the
Emergency Committee for American Trade, the U.S.-China Education Fund and the Business
Coalition for U.S.-China Trade.
One of their standard arguments, of course, is "free trade is good for both U.S. and China" which
sounds logical. In fact, however, Communist China does not allow foreign-owned industry to sell
goods to the Chinese people. Beijing imports raw materials only to manufacture goods for re-export --
to the United States and other free world countries.
As The New York Times noted (June 25, 1997): "lobbying effort operated on the retail level too.
One retailer warned that 'Tickle Me Elmo' dolls would soar in price if higher tariffs were
imposed on Chinese goods." This caused at least one Administration advisor to cringe: "it makes
it sound like we should decide China policy at Toys 'R' Us."
Nonetheless, as U.S.-China trade expert Harry Wu, a former prisoner in the Chinese gulag, notes:
retail clothing with Arnold Palmer, Playboy and Garfield labels are typical of some of the
merchandise coming to the U.S. from China produced in a prison in Guangdong Province. Other
slave labor products, he adds, are sold by such companies as Officemate and Chrysler, which has
its own joint-venture project the Beijing Jeep Corp./Beijing Auto Works. Kmart Co., with
headquarters in Troy, MI, says Wu, sells a variety of toys and other merchandise made in slave
labor prisons operated by China's army.
"In America," writes A.M. Rosenthal -- former editor of The New York Times -- "the China trade
lobby was Beijing's instrument of pressure, persuading [President] Clinton to kill human rights as
part of U.S. policy. From that, all else flowed. China and other dictatorships have shown
throughout modem history that they can expand economically without expanding liberty -- as
long as the democracies are so submissively ready to transfer their capital and technology to
them."
The "chatter that investors will want China to be more 'liberal' about human freedoms" is so
much bunk, says Times' Rosenthal, based on "the muddy-minded assumption that investors in
China care about anything except profits." To which Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio
adds a potential bumper-sticker zinger if there ever was one: "Freedom should mean
more than
selling fertilizer!"
OTHER COMPANIES TRADING IN RED CHINA'S SLAVE MARKET
Made in China:
Behind the Label
